Chungcheong · Capital markets desk

Reports that survive scrutiny

Infra Data

A quiet academy for teams who must verify investment reporting packages—NAV bridges, fee waterfall notes, and manager commentary—before they leave the desk.

Open flagship program
217 reporting packages stress-tested in cohort labs
38 fund and family-office desks coached since 2019
11 years focused on Korea market filing rhythms
Analyst reviewing financial dashboards

Flagship immersion

Investment Report Audit Studio

Six modules that treat a financial auditing app for investment reporting reviews as a working method—not a product demo. You learn how to bind source extracts to narrative claims, flag restatements, and write review memos that legal and risk teams can reuse.

Cohorts work from anonymized Korea-market packs and regional alternatives so sampling choices feel familiar on Monday morning.

View curriculum

Why desks enroll

Discipline before decoration

We teach review craft that keeps polished slides honest. The goal is fewer late surprises when an allocator, auditor, or regulator asks for the trail behind a single percentage.

  • 01

    Traceable claim maps

    Link every headline performance sentence to a worksheet cell, custodian extract, or fee schedule clause—and know when a claim should stay off the page.

  • 02

    Sampling that respects seasonality

    Build review samples that catch quarter-end window dressing without pretending random picks alone are enough for concentrated books.

  • 03

    Memo language that travels

    Write findings that survive translation between Korean internal notes and English LP packs without softening material issues.

Programs

Choose a depth of review

Data charts on a monitor

Flagship · 6 weeks

Investment Report Audit Studio

End-to-end review of performance packs, fee waterfalls, and manager letters.

 Hands reviewing printed statements

Workshop · 3 days

NAV Bridge Intensive

Short cohort focused on reconciling reported NAV moves to ledger evidence.

 Market candlestick charts

Clinic · evenings

Commentary Integrity Clinic

Pressure-test qualitative claims against holdings and risk factors.

From the room

What reviewers took back to the desk

“The claim-map exercise on Module 3 forced us to drop two sentences from our monthly LP note. Painful, but cleaner than explaining them later.”

Hyeonwoo Park · Performance oversight, Seoul

“Useful for fee waterfall walkthroughs. I still wish the sample pack included more private credit schedules—our book is heavier there than the cohort materials.”

Mina · Busan
★★★★☆ · Platform note

Completed Investment Report Audit Studio. Strong on Korea filing cadence; lighter on crypto-adjacent vehicles.

Verified learner · fund operations

Journal

Recent field notes

Desk with reports and laptop

12 Mar 2026

How footnotes rewrite the story in Korean fund reports

Where review teams miss material caveats hiding in small type.

 Calculator and financial papers

28 Jan 2026

Five NAV discrepancy patterns that survive first pass

A field checklist for desks reviewing investment reporting packs.

Browse the journal →

Bring your next reporting cycle into the studio

Tell us which packs you review. We will point you to the right program depth—no checkout pressure, just a clear recommendation.

Talk with Infra Data